6.2 Twin Paradox

MIT OpenCourseWare · Beginner ·🔍 RAG & Vector Search ·4y ago
Skills: RAG Basics80%

Key Takeaways

The twin paradox in special relativity is discussed, using the example of Bob and Alice, with Alice traveling at 0.66 times the speed of light to a distant star and back, while Bob stays on Earth. The paradox arises from the apparent discrepancy in the time experienced by each twin, with Alice aging less than Bob due to time dilation. The resolution of the paradox is explained by the need for Alice to change reference frames during her journey, which introduces an asymmetry between the two twins

Full Transcript

welcome back to a20 special relativity in this section we talk about the famous twin paradox it's probably the most famous paradox in special relativity i want to get to the bottom of this and understand really where there is a conflicting or contradictory statement in this story let me just first say that this year is personal to me i do have a twin brother and you can see three pictures of myself and my twin brother here you know very little on our first day of school in germany you get a little box of candy i mean when you go to schools to make it more attractive to actually learn and study and then a picture which is probably already about 10 years old so what you can take away from here is clearly moving clocks are slow it turns out that my twin brother lives in the very same village in germany where i grew up where we both grew up why while i traveled the world constantly and funds me on the road um between france and geneva and switzerland and the united states and again i think there is no dispute here it can be seen from this picture that your professor looks much younger i even have a more recent picture this is two years ago the german chris candle market where i asked my brother to take this picture for this class for age 20 and again i think the answer to the question is clear professor clutter has aged less all right on a more serious note um we want to quantitatively understand and analyze the situation and we use bob and alice again in this situation here bob stays local and alice has a spacecraft and she moves with a velocity of 0.66 times the speed of light a gamma factor of 1.25 her travel takes her to a distant star which is in this example three light years away from bob measured by bob um the journey takes her on bob's clock five years and the return takes another five years she doesn't spend much time she wants to go home as quickly as possible so if you analyze this from alice's perspective we see that for alice the journey takes four years and the distance traveled for her in the spacecraft is zero okay from bob's perspective the journey as seen by alice is only two point three point two years long and so we find that there's already a conflict if we add the times together both ways the inbound and the outbound waste um 6.4 years is not equal to 10 years so there's already a contradictory statement in the story but the key to the understanding of this problem is that alice in order to return has to change reference frames and there you do have to re-synchronize the clocks if you want or add a specific extra factor and we'll go back to this and we look at space-time diagrams so the time as seen by bob is 3.2 years for the outbound journey and then 3.6 years in order to re-synchronize the clocks on the return on the turning around and then 3.2 years on the return which makes 10 years and so that observation of bob of alice is in agreement with bob's own clock all right so we saved the day here so let's look at space-time diagrams the outbound journey is is shown here you see i've got it in addition to bob's reference frame i plotted alice's reference and it makes it easier to understand what's going on so we see in alice's reference frame the journey takes four years if you then go back to the position in which bob is two points three point two years have passed okay so this is if he adds the time at the time when alice arrives we go back to the position of bob 3.3 years have passed and we then turn around and ask the very same question at that time and still four years we go back in the other direction now to bob we are already um much further ahead two points three point two years blood plus plus three point six years okay and then the journey continues and we add another 3.2 years to the journey so when alice and bob reunite l is aged by 8 years 2 times four and bob aged by ten years so the question now is is there maybe a paradox here is it possible that we miss somehow that why and try to understand why is this problem not symmetric why can i not just use the other reference frame and just declare that alice stayed stationary in her in a spacecraft where bob moved away with earth and then came back why are those two things not consistent and the answer is that it's not bob who has to change reference frame but at alice it's alice will have to do this there is where the asymmetry is so you can argue if you want that in order for alice to do that she actually has to accelerate but we don't have any sort of discussion of how the acceleration actually went about it's really the change in reference frame which is crucial in this discussion and causes a symmetry between bob and alice you

Original Description

MIT 8.20 Introduction to Special Relativity, January IAP 2021 Instructor: Markus Klute View the complete course: https://ocw.mit.edu/8-20IAP21 YouTube Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLUl4u3cNGP61Zc3rR6wVM0kpsiyIq0fk8 We discuss the twin paradox. License: Creative Commons BY-NC-SA More information at https://ocw.mit.edu/terms More courses at https://ocw.mit.edu Support OCW at http://ow.ly/a1If50zVRlQ We encourage constructive comments and discussion on OCW’s YouTube and other social media channels. Personal attacks, hate speech, trolling, and inappropriate comments are not allowed and may be removed. More details at https://ocw.mit.edu/comments.
Watch on YouTube ↗ (saves to browser)
Sign in to unlock AI tutor explanation · ⚡30

Playlist

Uploads from MIT OpenCourseWare · MIT OpenCourseWare · 0 of 60

← Previous Next →
1 21. Post Trade Clearing, Settlement & Processing
21. Post Trade Clearing, Settlement & Processing
MIT OpenCourseWare
2 10. Financial System Challenges & Opportunities
10. Financial System Challenges & Opportunities
MIT OpenCourseWare
3 7. Technical Challenges
7. Technical Challenges
MIT OpenCourseWare
4 3. Blockchain Basics & Cryptography
3. Blockchain Basics & Cryptography
MIT OpenCourseWare
5 19. Primary Markets, ICOs & Venture Capital, Part 1
19. Primary Markets, ICOs & Venture Capital, Part 1
MIT OpenCourseWare
6 1. Introduction for 15.S12 Blockchain and Money, Fall 2018
1. Introduction for 15.S12 Blockchain and Money, Fall 2018
MIT OpenCourseWare
7 Chalk Radio, A Podcast about Inspired Teaching at MIT (Teaser)
Chalk Radio, A Podcast about Inspired Teaching at MIT (Teaser)
MIT OpenCourseWare
8 Nuclear Gets Personal with Prof. Michael Short (S1:E1)
Nuclear Gets Personal with Prof. Michael Short (S1:E1)
MIT OpenCourseWare
9 How Africa Has Been Made to Mean with Prof. Amah Edoh (S1:E2)
How Africa Has Been Made to Mean with Prof. Amah Edoh (S1:E2)
MIT OpenCourseWare
10 Making Deep Learning Human with Prof. Gilbert Strang (S1:E3)
Making Deep Learning Human with Prof. Gilbert Strang (S1:E3)
MIT OpenCourseWare
11 Social Impact at Scale, One Project at a Time with Dr. Anjali Sastry (S1:E4)
Social Impact at Scale, One Project at a Time with Dr. Anjali Sastry (S1:E4)
MIT OpenCourseWare
12 Film is for Everyone with Prof. David Thorburn (S1:E5)
Film is for Everyone with Prof. David Thorburn (S1:E5)
MIT OpenCourseWare
13 Lecture 12: Aircraft Performance
Lecture 12: Aircraft Performance
MIT OpenCourseWare
14 Lecture 3: Learning to Fly
Lecture 3: Learning to Fly
MIT OpenCourseWare
15 Lecture 13:  Interpreting Weather Data
Lecture 13: Interpreting Weather Data
MIT OpenCourseWare
16 Lecture 21: Weather Minimums and Final Tips
Lecture 21: Weather Minimums and Final Tips
MIT OpenCourseWare
17 Hand-on, Minds On with Dr. Christopher Terman (S1:E6)
Hand-on, Minds On with Dr. Christopher Terman (S1:E6)
MIT OpenCourseWare
18 Part 4: Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Part 4: Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
MIT OpenCourseWare
19 Part 5: Singular Values and Singular Vectors
Part 5: Singular Values and Singular Vectors
MIT OpenCourseWare
20 Part 3: Orthogonal Vectors
Part 3: Orthogonal Vectors
MIT OpenCourseWare
21 Part 2: The Big Picture of Linear Algebra
Part 2: The Big Picture of Linear Algebra
MIT OpenCourseWare
22 Part 1: The Column Space of a Matrix
Part 1: The Column Space of a Matrix
MIT OpenCourseWare
23 Intro: A New Way to Start Linear Algebra
Intro: A New Way to Start Linear Algebra
MIT OpenCourseWare
24 9. Chromatin Remodeling and Splicing
9. Chromatin Remodeling and Splicing
MIT OpenCourseWare
25 28. Visualizing Life - Fluorescent Proteins
28. Visualizing Life - Fluorescent Proteins
MIT OpenCourseWare
26 20. Roth's theorem III: polynomial method and arithmetic regularity
20. Roth's theorem III: polynomial method and arithmetic regularity
MIT OpenCourseWare
27 8. Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma III: further applications
8. Szemerédi's graph regularity lemma III: further applications
MIT OpenCourseWare
28 19. Roth's theorem II: Fourier analytic proof in the integers
19. Roth's theorem II: Fourier analytic proof in the integers
MIT OpenCourseWare
29 12. Pseudorandom graphs II: second eigenvalue
12. Pseudorandom graphs II: second eigenvalue
MIT OpenCourseWare
30 1. A bridge between graph theory and additive combinatorics
1. A bridge between graph theory and additive combinatorics
MIT OpenCourseWare
31 Special Episode: Teaching Remotely During Covid-19 with Prof. Justin Reich
Special Episode: Teaching Remotely During Covid-19 with Prof. Justin Reich
MIT OpenCourseWare
32 Spring 2020 Update from Dean Rajagopal
Spring 2020 Update from Dean Rajagopal
MIT OpenCourseWare
33 S1E7: Unpacking Misconceptions about Language & Identities with Prof. Michel DeGraff
S1E7: Unpacking Misconceptions about Language & Identities with Prof. Michel DeGraff
MIT OpenCourseWare
34 Climate 101 Live
Climate 101 Live
MIT OpenCourseWare
35 Welcome for Volunteers (for EarthDNA's Climate 101)
Welcome for Volunteers (for EarthDNA's Climate 101)
MIT OpenCourseWare
36 Learning to Fly with Drs. Philip Greenspun & Tina Srivastava (S1:E8)
Learning to Fly with Drs. Philip Greenspun & Tina Srivastava (S1:E8)
MIT OpenCourseWare
37 Thinking Like an Economist with Prof. Jonathan Gruber (S1:E9)
Thinking Like an Economist with Prof. Jonathan Gruber (S1:E9)
MIT OpenCourseWare
38 2. Cyber Network Data Processing; AI Data Architecture
2. Cyber Network Data Processing; AI Data Architecture
MIT OpenCourseWare
39 1. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
1. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
MIT OpenCourseWare
40 2: Resistor Capacitor Circuit and Nernst Potential - Intro to Neural Computation
2: Resistor Capacitor Circuit and Nernst Potential - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
41 14: Rate Models and Perceptrons - Intro to Neural Computation
14: Rate Models and Perceptrons - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
42 4: Hodgkin-Huxley Model Part 1 - Intro to Neural Computation
4: Hodgkin-Huxley Model Part 1 - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
43 18: Recurrent Networks - Intro to Neural Computation
18: Recurrent Networks - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
44 3: Resistor Capacitor Neuron Model - Intro to Neural Computation
3: Resistor Capacitor Neuron Model - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
45 15: Matrix Operations - Intro to Neural Computation
15: Matrix Operations - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
46 13: Spectral Analysis Part 3 - Intro to Neural Computation
13: Spectral Analysis Part 3 - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
47 16: Basis Sets - Intro to Neural Computation
16: Basis Sets - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
48 20: Hopfield Networks - Intro to Neural Computation
20: Hopfield Networks - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
49 8: Spike Trains - Intro to Neural Computation
8: Spike Trains - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
50 7: Synapses - Intro to Neural Computation
7: Synapses - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
51 19: Neural Integrators - Intro to Neural Computation
19: Neural Integrators - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
52 5: Hodgkin-Huxley Model Part 2 - Intro to Neural Computation
5: Hodgkin-Huxley Model Part 2 - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
53 6: Dendrites - Intro to Neural Computation
6: Dendrites - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
54 17: Principal Components Analysis_ - Intro to Neural Computation
17: Principal Components Analysis_ - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
55 12: Spectral Analysis Part 2 - Intro to Neural Computation
12: Spectral Analysis Part 2 - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
56 11: Spectral Analysis Part 1 - Intro to Neural Computation
11: Spectral Analysis Part 1 - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
57 9: Receptive Fields - Intro to Neural Computation
9: Receptive Fields - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
58 10: Time Series - Intro to Neural Computation
10: Time Series - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
59 1: Course Overview and Ionic Currents - Intro to Neural Computation
1: Course Overview and Ionic Currents - Intro to Neural Computation
MIT OpenCourseWare
60 The Power of OER with Profs. Mary Rowe and Elizabeth Siler (S1:E10)
The Power of OER with Profs. Mary Rowe and Elizabeth Siler (S1:E10)
MIT OpenCourseWare

The twin paradox is a thought experiment that illustrates the effects of time dilation in special relativity. By analyzing the journey of Alice and Bob, we can understand how time dilation leads to an apparent discrepancy in the time experienced by each twin. The resolution of the paradox lies in the need for Alice to change reference frames during her journey, introducing an asymmetry between the two twins.

Key Takeaways
  1. Understand the concept of time dilation
  2. Apply time dilation to the twin paradox scenario
  3. Analyze space-time diagrams to visualize the journey of Alice and Bob
  4. Identify the asymmetry introduced by Alice's change in reference frames
  5. Resolve the paradox by accounting for the change in reference frames
💡 The change in reference frames is crucial to resolving the twin paradox, introducing an asymmetry between the two twins.

Related Reads

Up next
Vector Databases Explained: The Complete Guide for 2026
Aishwarya Srinivasan
Watch →