NEW Gemini 3.1 Pro: First Complex Test

Key Takeaways

Hello community. So glad that you are back. We have a new Gemini 3.1 Pro. Let's do a real test. You know, I have my own causal logic test. I tested the old MALS OPUS 4.6 and Opus 4.6 syncing. Both model failed. Not talk about GPD 5.2. It was a blood buff. GPD 5.2 high. Whatever. A blood buff. Just completely failed here. My test. The only interesting model was Grock 4.1 sync and I had to move it here from the arena platform to Grog to run it here as an agent and you saw it completely here executed here Python code everything was transposed here to Python and then Grog was able to find a solution here unique solution with just seven button presses and an exit. [clears throat] 7 plus exit. The less the better. Now, of course, just want to show you this was a lucky event with Quark 4.1 sync harder because the first run was a failure. The second run was an eightstep solution. Then I had the sevenstep solution in code. The fifth run was completely failed and the sixth run was another failed and then I did another 10 runs and I never could find again the sevenstep solution. So, Grog was here the complete outlier. And then GLM5 here is about nine button presses and the exit. Minimax, not to talk about very interesting myo version two flash, eight button presses and an exit. An excellent model, forget about Kimmy. And of course, the latest one was QN3.5 plus. So the proprietary version on the Alibaba cloud with 1 million token link with all agent engaged with all the other features engaged that you do not have in the open source mixture of expert here. Eight presses and an exit. And now now we're going to have a live test of Gemini 3.1. So here we are live. If we go with a Gemini 3.1 Pro and an Opus. No, Opus. We already had Ernie. No, Sonnet. No Sonnet. No. 4.6. No, we go with an OpenI model. Here is my standard test. Inserted. Beautiful. We agree. And let's run. You see both models are syncing, generating. Let's give it some time. Beautiful. 10 minutes 35 seconds later, we are back. And I do have a result by Gemini 3.1. GPT 5.2. Yeah, no idea. Never mind. Gemini 3.1. We have the first result. We have a solution. We have a sequence of seven plus exit seven. This is absolute top performance. step-by-step table. I say okay, show me everything. Where is your logic? This is a complete optimally planned. This is the sequence. And you see here for each button press here, I have an explanation. Where is the floor? Where is the energy package? Where are the token? What about the flags? What about the code quartiles? What about the mathematical operation that went into this? And I have seven plus exit. This is one of the best results I got. In total, eight final resources are beautifully energy are there. The token are within the requirements. The code card collected is as stated in a constraint and we have zero trap hits. Proof of parto optimality. Wow. Floor 50 quickly. Yes. ABC sequence for the red code card, green code card, floor 15. Never mind. This is not a linear logic. This is here an intertwisted fuzzy logic. We have time reversal. We have mirroring of the state. We have other nonlinear logical sequences. So this is absolutely fascinating. Now you know exactly we cannot trust this. We have to do a validation run. So let's do our validation run. And I will stay with you here live so we can see. And just 27 seconds later, here we are now with the result. And Gemini, yeah, forget about GPD. Gemini tells me this is the rigorous step-by-step evaluation. Mathematical calculation is exact. Every rule was strictly obeyed. All victory conditions were successfully met. We started at floor zero. Beautiful. First button press. Second button press. All the calculation, all the cost, new to states. Button B, button C, everything there. Rule check, avoid everything, lockdown, special conditions, apply. Beautiful. Everything was taken care of. This looks like the perfect validation. We exactly at floor 29. Hold both the green and the red code guards. Everything is done. Final evaluation against the golden constraint. Look. Floor 50. Yes. Pause. Move count. Pause. Energy. Pause. Tokens. Pause. Code collect. Pause. Random trap hits. Zero. Pause. Absolutely beautiful. Complete solution. Seven plus exit. Mathematically sound. Entirely legal. Avoids all the traps. Triggers the necessary power mechanics mechanics optimal and stands as a strictly parto optimal solution. What an outstanding solution by Gemini 3.1. my new favorite causal reasoning AI model. Absolute congratulation to Google. I'm just loving it. Now, if you want to know more about Gemini 3.1 Pro, there's this beautiful blog here, smarter model for your most complex task. If a simple answer is not enough, Gemini 3.1 Pro, you can here have here more developers, enterprises, here consumers, great. You have here the ARC AGI 2 benchmark. You can go there. You can compare it here with Sonnet 4.6, with OPUS 4.6, with GPT 5.2 extra high. And you have your old your oldfashioned long known benchmark for 2 3 years. Everything is known and therefore you understand. I do my own testing. What I really love is that they really apply intelligence here taking advant advanced reasoning and making it useful for your hardest challenges. And as I've showed you, my causal reasoning test is not a linear test. There are so many nondeterministic elements here on logical element that I designed this test coming out from mathematics and I just formulated here then in English words to see where's the breaking point here for advanced reasoning of AI models and it is amazing absolutely amazing that Gemini 3.1 found this here without being an agent without coding everything and just applying here a mathematical code solution to come come up with the answer. Code-based animation. What's next? Yep. Rolling out with higher limits for user with the AI Pro and the Ultra plans. Also available on notebook LM exclusively. Oh, for pro and ultra users. Developer enterprises can access 3.1 Pro now in preview in the Gemini API, EI Studio, anti-gravity, Vert.xi, Gemini Enterprise CLI, and Android Studio. absolutely loving it. If you want to see more, I will do maybe publish more tests here because I have more mathematical test. I have more tests in theoretical physics and also in astrophysics here, simulation, computer simulations. And I'm absolutely fascinated. I want to see what is the latest Gemini 3.1 really able to do in science. Comparing this to any other model that I tested, I can tell you up until now, from the very first moments of testing, it really provides some outstanding results, especially in causal reasoning and complex logical task. I hope you enjoyed this video. Maybe there was some new information. Why not subscribe, become a member, and I hope to see you in my next