CI/CD Is Dead, Agents Need Continuous Compute and Computers — Hugo Santos and Madison Faulkner
Traditional CI/CD was built for humans pushing one or two diffs a week. Scale to thousands of autonomous agents opening PRs continuously and you get runner saturation, cold Docker builds on every branch, cache thrash, and a merge queue that starts behaving like a serialized database lock where time-to-commit becomes the actual bottleneck.
Madison Faulkner and Hugo Santos (Namespace) lay out what replaces it: no PRs, just intent and plan fed into an agent loop with fast inline validation. Changes queue in a premerge layer where humans review intent-plus-outcome rather than diffs. The end state they're pointing toward is agents exploring multiple commits in parallel for the same plan, a multiverse where the tip of the repo is a moving target and the inner loop needs to be stateful and fast enough to keep up.
Speaker info:
- https://x.com/madsfaulkner
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/madisonhfaulkner/
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/hugomgsantos/
Watch on YouTube ↗
(saves to browser)
Sign in to unlock AI tutor explanation · ⚡30
More on: Agent Foundations
View skill →Related AI Lessons
⚡
⚡
⚡
⚡
Anthropic courts a new kind of customer: small business owners
TechCrunch AI
How I Built an Autonomous AI SIEM With 10 Neural Networks in 3 Months
Medium · Machine Learning
Can AI Help Swiss SMEs Survive the Productivity Challenge?
Medium · AI
OpenAI’s Agent Traces Just Made Pretty Demos Dangerous
Medium · AI
🎓
Tutor Explanation
DeepCamp AI