Can LLMs generate Enterprise Quality Code? — Prasenjit Sarkar, Sonar
Skills:
AI Pair Programming80%
Key Takeaways
Evaluates the code generation capabilities of various LLMs, including GPT-4, GPT 5.4, and Claude Sonnet 4.6, on Java programming assignments
Original Description
Sonar ran 4,444 Java programming assignments through 53 models and measured what actually came out. GPT-4o generated under 250,000 lines for those assignments. GPT 5.4 generated 1.2 million. Claude Sonnet 4.6 generated 627,000 with the highest security issue rate at 300 per million lines of code. Prasenjit Sarkar from Sonar walks through the full leaderboard: pass rate, cyclomatic complexity, bug density, and security issues per model.
Their response is a three-stage framework called ACDC: guide, verify, solve. The verify stage runs SonarQube analysis in 1 to 5 seconds before a commit, against 1 to 5 minutes in CI. If issues slip through to the PR, a remediation agent creates one fix per issue, runs it through analysis and compilation to check for regressions, and only presents it if it passes.
Speaker info:
- https://www.linkedin.com/in/jit2600/
Watch on YouTube ↗
(saves to browser)
Sign in to unlock AI tutor explanation · ⚡30
More on: AI Pair Programming
View skill →Related Reads
📰
📰
📰
📰
We let Qwen rewrite our scoring algorithm — but only through a clinical-style gate
Dev.to AI
I Built a 100% Offline AI Research Assistant for Reading Research Papers
Dev.to AI
Building Production-Grade LLM Evaluation Pipelines: From Vibes to Metrics
Dev.to AI
Why LLMs prioritize high-signal analytical networks and how to secure citations in an AI-driven…
Medium · AI
🎓
Tutor Explanation
DeepCamp AI