Which conference/journal do you believe currently has the most fair and accurate review process?[D]

Major conference acceptance has become pretty much random and review quality is constantly dropping. ​There is always that one reviewer who understood nothing but still rejects the paper because you didn't cite "X" or compare with "Y", and the meta-reviewer usually just goes along with it. In your opinion, is there a conference or journal with a solid review process that is even slightly less random than the others? submitted b