When Cosine and Dot Product Are Not Enough: Real Stories of Vector Search with Euclidean…

📰 Medium · Machine Learning

Learn when to use alternative distance metrics like Euclidean, Manhattan, Hamming, Jaccard, and BM25 for vector search, and how to choose the right one for your product

intermediate Published 19 Apr 2026
Action Steps
  1. Choose a distance metric based on the specific requirements of your vector search use case
  2. Implement Euclidean distance for cases where magnitude is important
  3. Use Manhattan distance for cases where the sum of absolute differences is relevant
  4. Apply Hamming distance for binary vectors or cases where exact matches are needed
  5. Experiment with Jaccard similarity for sets or cases where overlap is important
  6. Consider BM25 for text-based vector search or cases where term frequency is relevant
Who Needs to Know This

Machine learning engineers and data scientists working with vector databases and embeddings can benefit from understanding the limitations of cosine and dot product similarity metrics and how to apply alternative distance metrics to improve their products

Key Insight

💡 The choice of distance metric can significantly impact the performance of a vector search system, and alternative metrics like Euclidean, Manhattan, Hamming, Jaccard, and BM25 can be more effective in certain scenarios

Share This
Did you know that cosine and dot product are not enough for vector search? Learn about alternative distance metrics like Euclidean, Manhattan, and more! #MachineLearning #VectorSearch
Read full article → ← Back to Reads