When Cosine and Dot Product Are Not Enough: Real Stories of Vector Search with Euclidean…

📰 Medium · AI

Learn when to use alternative distance metrics like Euclidean, Manhattan, Hamming, Jaccard, and BM25 for vector search, and how to choose the right metric for your specific use case.

intermediate Published 19 Apr 2026
Action Steps
  1. Choose a distance metric based on the specific requirements of your project, such as Euclidean for continuous data or Jaccard for categorical data.
  2. Experiment with different distance metrics to find the best one for your use case.
  3. Consider the trade-offs between different distance metrics, such as computational efficiency and accuracy.
  4. Use techniques like data normalization and feature scaling to improve the performance of your chosen distance metric.
  5. Evaluate the performance of your distance metric using metrics like precision, recall, and F1 score.
Who Needs to Know This

Data scientists and engineers working with vector databases and embeddings can benefit from understanding the limitations of cosine and dot product similarity metrics and learning about alternative distance metrics.

Key Insight

💡 The choice of distance metric can significantly impact the performance of vector search, and alternative metrics like Euclidean, Manhattan, Hamming, Jaccard, and BM25 can be more effective in certain use cases.

Share This
Did you know that cosine and dot product similarity metrics aren't always enough? Learn about alternative distance metrics like Euclidean, Manhattan, and Jaccard for vector search! #vectorsearch #datascience
Read full article → ← Back to Reads