We evaluated Go, Rust, and Python for our LLM proxy. Go won - and not for the reason you'd expect.
📰 Dev.to · gauravdagde
Learn why Go was chosen over Rust and Python for building an LLM proxy, and the key engineering trade-offs that led to this decision
Action Steps
- Evaluate the performance requirements of your LLM proxy using Go, Rust, and Python
- Compare the memory safety features of Rust and Go for building a reliable LLM proxy
- Assess the development speed and ease of use of Python for building an LLM proxy
- Consider the concurrency features of Go for handling multiple requests to the LLM proxy
- Test the performance of your LLM proxy using different programming languages to determine the best choice
Who Needs to Know This
This article is relevant for software engineers, particularly those working with large language models (LLMs) and proxy development, as it discusses the trade-offs between different programming languages for building an LLM proxy
Key Insight
💡 The choice of programming language for building an LLM proxy depends on a range of factors, including performance, memory safety, development speed, and concurrency
Share This
🤖 Why Go won out over Rust and Python for building an LLM proxy 🤔
Key Takeaways
Learn why Go was chosen over Rust and Python for building an LLM proxy, and the key engineering trade-offs that led to this decision
Full Article
We built our LLM proxy in Go. Not Rust. Not Python. Here's the engineering trade-off nobody talks...
DeepCamp AI