Vulnerability disclosure program management
📰 Reddit r/cybersecurity
Learn how to manage AI-generated vulnerability reports in your Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP) to save time and resources
Action Steps
- Implement a filtering process to identify potentially low-quality AI-generated reports
- Push back on reports lacking proof-of-concept (PoC) or evidence of validation
- Request a full PoC from submitters before attempting internal validation
- Configure your VDP to require reproduction steps and evidence of validation for all submissions
- Test and refine your filtering process to minimize false negatives and optimize resource allocation
Who Needs to Know This
Security teams and VDP managers can benefit from this knowledge to efficiently handle AI-generated reports and prioritize validation efforts
Key Insight
💡 Not all AI-generated reports are created equal; implement a filtering process to prioritize high-quality reports and save time
Share This
🚨 Don't get bogged down in AI-generated vulnerability reports! 🚨 Learn how to efficiently manage your VDP and prioritize validation efforts
Key Takeaways
Learn how to manage AI-generated vulnerability reports in your Vulnerability Disclosure Program (VDP) to save time and resources
Full Article
For those who run VDPs, how are you handling the influx of AI slop reports? Do you push back and ask for a full PoC before attempting your own validation? A lot of these report provide reproduction steps but no evidence the submitter actually validated the finding. Trying to figure out how to best approach this situation so I’m not burning all my time trying to validate bunk reports. submitted by <a href="htt
DeepCamp AI