Towards a compositional semantics for quantitative confidence assessment in assurance arguments
📰 ArXiv cs.AI
Learn to assess quantitative confidence in assurance arguments using compositional semantics and Subjective Logic
Action Steps
- Apply Subjective Logic to assurance arguments to derive quantitative confidence
- Use compositional semantics to break down complex arguments into smaller components
- Evaluate the soundness of assurance arguments using formal methods
- Analyze the structure of assurance arguments to identify potential weaknesses
- Implement a confidence assessment framework using a programming language like Python
Who Needs to Know This
This research benefits AI engineers, data scientists, and software engineers working on assurance arguments and trustworthiness in AI systems, as it provides a framework for evaluating confidence in claims
Key Insight
💡 Compositional semantics and Subjective Logic can be used to derive quantitative confidence in assurance arguments
Share This
🚀 Assess confidence in assurance arguments with compositional semantics & Subjective Logic! 🤖
Key Takeaways
Learn to assess quantitative confidence in assurance arguments using compositional semantics and Subjective Logic
Full Article
Title: Towards a compositional semantics for quantitative confidence assessment in assurance arguments
Abstract:
arXiv:2605.22213v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assurance arguments provide a clear and structured way to explain why stakeholders should trust that a system satisfies certain properties, yet widely used notations, e.g.Goal Structuring Notation (GSN), typically lack an operational semantics for deriving assurance confidence. Existing approaches address structure and soundness but largely reason over truth values, not over confidence in the justification of claims. Subjective Logic (SL) offers a
Abstract:
arXiv:2605.22213v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Assurance arguments provide a clear and structured way to explain why stakeholders should trust that a system satisfies certain properties, yet widely used notations, e.g.Goal Structuring Notation (GSN), typically lack an operational semantics for deriving assurance confidence. Existing approaches address structure and soundness but largely reason over truth values, not over confidence in the justification of claims. Subjective Logic (SL) offers a
DeepCamp AI