Personalized Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs by Individual Preferences
📰 ArXiv cs.AI
arXiv:2604.18943v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the rise in capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and their deployment in real-world tasks, evaluating LLM alignment with human preferences has become an important challenge. Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings, overlooking individual user preferences when establishing model rankings. Since users have varying preferences in different contexts, we call for personalized LLM benchmarks that
Full Article
Title: Personalized Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs by Individual Preferences
Abstract:
arXiv:2604.18943v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the rise in capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and their deployment in real-world tasks, evaluating LLM alignment with human preferences has become an important challenge. Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings, overlooking individual user preferences when establishing model rankings. Since users have varying preferences in different contexts, we call for personalized LLM benchmarks that
Abstract:
arXiv:2604.18943v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the rise in capabilities of large language models (LLMs) and their deployment in real-world tasks, evaluating LLM alignment with human preferences has become an important challenge. Current benchmarks average preferences across all users to compute aggregate ratings, overlooking individual user preferences when establishing model rankings. Since users have varying preferences in different contexts, we call for personalized LLM benchmarks that
DeepCamp AI