Creating and Evaluating Figurative Language Dataset for Sindhi
📰 ArXiv cs.AI
Learn to create and evaluate a figurative language dataset for Sindhi, a crucial step in NLP for low-resource languages
Action Steps
- Collect raw text from various sources such as blogs and social media platforms
- Prepare the corpus for annotation using tools like Doccano
- Label the data using native annotators to achieve high inter-annotator agreement
- Establish baseline results using cross-validation techniques like 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validation
- Evaluate the performance of the dataset using metrics like accuracy and F1-score
Who Needs to Know This
NLP researchers and developers working with low-resource languages like Sindhi can benefit from this dataset to improve their models' performance
Key Insight
💡 Creating a high-quality dataset for figurative language classification is crucial for improving NLP models' performance in low-resource languages like Sindhi
Share This
📊 Introducing SiNFluD, a novel benchmark dataset for Sindhi figurative language classification! 🚀
Key Takeaways
Learn to create and evaluate a figurative language dataset for Sindhi, a crucial step in NLP for low-resource languages
Full Article
Title: Creating and Evaluating Figurative Language Dataset for Sindhi
Abstract:
arXiv:2605.01323v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this article, we introduce SiNFluD, a novel benchmark dataset for Sindhi figurative language classification. We first collect raw text from various blogs, social media platforms, and literary sources, and subsequently prepare the corpus for annotation. Two native annotators label the data using the Doccano text annotation tool, achieving an inter-annotator agreement of 0.81. We then establish baseline results using 5-fold and 10-fold cross-val
Abstract:
arXiv:2605.01323v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this article, we introduce SiNFluD, a novel benchmark dataset for Sindhi figurative language classification. We first collect raw text from various blogs, social media platforms, and literary sources, and subsequently prepare the corpus for annotation. Two native annotators label the data using the Doccano text annotation tool, achieving an inter-annotator agreement of 0.81. We then establish baseline results using 5-fold and 10-fold cross-val
DeepCamp AI